<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr&#8230;Can news orgs be everywhere?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lavrusik.com/2009/11/23/can-news-orgs-be-everywhere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lavrusik.com/2009/11/23/can-news-orgs-be-everywhere/</link>
	<description>Digital Media Journalist &#124; Social Media Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jornalismo 2.0: Pode? &#171; Modo Mídia</title>
		<link>http://lavrusik.com/2009/11/23/can-news-orgs-be-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Jornalismo 2.0: Pode? &#171; Modo Mídia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lavrusik.com/?p=811#comment-140</guid>
		<description>[...] editora de mídias sociais do NYT, Jen Preston, perguntou ao jornalista Vadim Lavrusik pelo Twitter: &#8220;Facebook, Twitter, Tumbrl &#8211; os veículos de jornalismo podem estar em [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] editora de mídias sociais do NYT, Jen Preston, perguntou ao jornalista Vadim Lavrusik pelo Twitter: &#8220;Facebook, Twitter, Tumbrl &#8211; os veículos de jornalismo podem estar em [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lavrusik</title>
		<link>http://lavrusik.com/2009/11/23/can-news-orgs-be-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>lavrusik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lavrusik.com/?p=811#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Thanks for responding. It&#039;s also one of the same reasons I started my own Tumblr (more to just be creative).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for responding. It&#39;s also one of the same reasons I started my own Tumblr (more to just be creative).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Coatney</title>
		<link>http://lavrusik.com/2009/11/23/can-news-orgs-be-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Coatney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lavrusik.com/?p=811#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Hey--here&#039;s our reasoning behind the Newsweek Tumblr:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Why do we Tumbl? In the end, we use Tumblr not because it’s a great way to connect with our readers (though it is that), or because we believe this or something like it is a part of a new way forward for interaction between publishers and audience (though we think that too). We use Tumblr because it’s fun and while, you know, you can’t eat fun, or trade it in for fistfulls of dollars to fund serious journalism, we believe there’s a value in doing things we like simply because we like to do them, and that hopefully our fellow Tumblrs will too.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newsweek.tumblr.com/post/255742202/why-we-tumbl&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://newsweek.tumblr.com/post/255742202/why-w...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey&#8211;here&#39;s our reasoning behind the Newsweek Tumblr:</p>
<p>&#8220;Why do we Tumbl? In the end, we use Tumblr not because it’s a great way to connect with our readers (though it is that), or because we believe this or something like it is a part of a new way forward for interaction between publishers and audience (though we think that too). We use Tumblr because it’s fun and while, you know, you can’t eat fun, or trade it in for fistfulls of dollars to fund serious journalism, we believe there’s a value in doing things we like simply because we like to do them, and that hopefully our fellow Tumblrs will too.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://newsweek.tumblr.com/post/255742202/why-we-tumbl" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://newsweek.tumblr.com/post/255742202/why-w.." rel="nofollow">http://newsweek.tumblr.com/post/255742202/why-w..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel_Honigman</title>
		<link>http://lavrusik.com/2009/11/23/can-news-orgs-be-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel_Honigman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lavrusik.com/?p=811#comment-242</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree with your points, except for Aardvark. You get lots of questions on there that could be answered with quick Google searches. Also, there&#039;s little no opportunity for news organizations to really brand themselves there. And what happened when you get a question you don&#039;t have time to answer?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While some conversation may take place on Tumblr/Posterous, it&#039;s mostly a great way to streamline your social media workflow and tell alternative, collaborative stories. They&#039;re not social networks per se, but it makes sense to be there only when it&#039;s the best option. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A &quot;hedgehog&quot; mentality needs to be taken in newsrooms, which now seem to be grasping for every shiny new social media object. If it makes sense, use it. If it doesn&#039;t, don&#039;t. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree with your points, except for Aardvark. You get lots of questions on there that could be answered with quick Google searches. Also, there&#39;s little no opportunity for news organizations to really brand themselves there. And what happened when you get a question you don&#39;t have time to answer?</p>
<p>While some conversation may take place on Tumblr/Posterous, it&#39;s mostly a great way to streamline your social media workflow and tell alternative, collaborative stories. They&#39;re not social networks per se, but it makes sense to be there only when it&#39;s the best option. </p>
<p>A &#8220;hedgehog&#8221; mentality needs to be taken in newsrooms, which now seem to be grasping for every shiny new social media object. If it makes sense, use it. If it doesn&#39;t, don&#39;t. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lavrusik</title>
		<link>http://lavrusik.com/2009/11/23/can-news-orgs-be-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>lavrusik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lavrusik.com/?p=811#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Thanks for responding. It&#039;s also one of the same reasons I started my own Tumblr (more to just be creative).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for responding. It&#39;s also one of the same reasons I started my own Tumblr (more to just be creative).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcoatney</title>
		<link>http://lavrusik.com/2009/11/23/can-news-orgs-be-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>mcoatney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lavrusik.com/?p=811#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Hey--here&#039;s our reasoning behind the Newsweek Tumblr:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Why do we Tumbl? In the end, we use Tumblr not because it’s a great way to connect with our readers (though it is that), or because we believe this or something like it is a part of a new way forward for interaction between publishers and audience (though we think that too). We use Tumblr because it’s fun and while, you know, you can’t eat fun, or trade it in for fistfulls of dollars to fund serious journalism, we believe there’s a value in doing things we like simply because we like to do them, and that hopefully our fellow Tumblrs will too.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newsweek.tumblr.com/post/255742202/why-we-tumbl&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://newsweek.tumblr.com/post/255742202/why-w...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey&#8211;here&#39;s our reasoning behind the Newsweek Tumblr:</p>
<p>&#8220;Why do we Tumbl? In the end, we use Tumblr not because it’s a great way to connect with our readers (though it is that), or because we believe this or something like it is a part of a new way forward for interaction between publishers and audience (though we think that too). We use Tumblr because it’s fun and while, you know, you can’t eat fun, or trade it in for fistfulls of dollars to fund serious journalism, we believe there’s a value in doing things we like simply because we like to do them, and that hopefully our fellow Tumblrs will too.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://newsweek.tumblr.com/post/255742202/why-we-tumbl" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://newsweek.tumblr.com/post/255742202/why-w.." rel="nofollow">http://newsweek.tumblr.com/post/255742202/why-w..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boa pergunta : Ponto Media</title>
		<link>http://lavrusik.com/2009/11/23/can-news-orgs-be-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Boa pergunta : Ponto Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lavrusik.com/?p=811#comment-136</guid>
		<description>[...] INDISPENSÁVEL: Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr…Can news orgs be everywhere? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] INDISPENSÁVEL: Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr…Can news orgs be everywhere? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel_Honigman</title>
		<link>http://lavrusik.com/2009/11/23/can-news-orgs-be-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel_Honigman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lavrusik.com/?p=811#comment-135</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree with your points, except for Aardvark. You get lots of questions on there that could be answered with quick Google searches. Also, there&#039;s little no opportunity for news organizations to really brand themselves there. And what happened when you get a question you don&#039;t have time to answer?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While some conversation may take place on Tumblr/Posterous, it&#039;s mostly a great way to streamline your social media workflow and tell alternative, collaborative stories. They&#039;re not social networks per se, but it makes sense to be there only when it&#039;s the best option. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A &quot;hedgehog&quot; mentality needs to be taken in newsrooms, which now seem to be grasping for every shiny new social media object. If it makes sense, use it. If it doesn&#039;t, don&#039;t. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree with your points, except for Aardvark. You get lots of questions on there that could be answered with quick Google searches. Also, there&#39;s little no opportunity for news organizations to really brand themselves there. And what happened when you get a question you don&#39;t have time to answer?</p>
<p>While some conversation may take place on Tumblr/Posterous, it&#39;s mostly a great way to streamline your social media workflow and tell alternative, collaborative stories. They&#39;re not social networks per se, but it makes sense to be there only when it&#39;s the best option. </p>
<p>A &#8220;hedgehog&#8221; mentality needs to be taken in newsrooms, which now seem to be grasping for every shiny new social media object. If it makes sense, use it. If it doesn&#39;t, don&#39;t. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lavrusik</title>
		<link>http://lavrusik.com/2009/11/23/can-news-orgs-be-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>lavrusik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lavrusik.com/?p=811#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Just signed up for Aardvark :) And yes, especially for news orgs I think that the audience matters. But you can also reach new audiences by going to these social sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just signed up for Aardvark <img src='http://lavrusik.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  And yes, especially for news orgs I think that the audience matters. But you can also reach new audiences by going to these social sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Buttry</title>
		<link>http://lavrusik.com/2009/11/23/can-news-orgs-be-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Buttry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lavrusik.com/?p=811#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Interesting discussion, Vadim. I don&#039;t think a news organization should be on every  social platform, but should be on the ones that are used by significant slices of the community. And you want to get on them pretty early. So I&#039;d say you need to use quite a bit, probably more than you&#039;re comfortable with (and I say this as someone who&#039;s not on Tumblr yet). Gotta be on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Flickr. And be watching for other platforms such as Tumblr and Posterous to start gathering steam. I asked a room of 50 or so journalists and journalism students last week if anyone was on Aardvark (I am) and no one raised their hands. So I wouldn&#039;t make Aardvark a priority. Yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion, Vadim. I don&#39;t think a news organization should be on every  social platform, but should be on the ones that are used by significant slices of the community. And you want to get on them pretty early. So I&#39;d say you need to use quite a bit, probably more than you&#39;re comfortable with (and I say this as someone who&#39;s not on Tumblr yet). Gotta be on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Flickr. And be watching for other platforms such as Tumblr and Posterous to start gathering steam. I asked a room of 50 or so journalists and journalism students last week if anyone was on Aardvark (I am) and no one raised their hands. So I wouldn&#39;t make Aardvark a priority. Yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
